Q. Is this a dangerous ideology or totalitarianism?
A.
This concept is different from totalitarianism.
Generally, totalitarianism concentrates power, fixes people into place, and tends to control thought.
On the other hand, the Borderless Earth concept:
- disperses power
- does not fix people in place
- does not control thought
Eliminating nations and borders is not for strengthening control, but to create a structure in which control is difficult to establish.
This concept does not force specific values or ideologies and does not aim at domination or control.
Q. Will the World Stability Organization become a dictatorship?
A.
The World Stability Organization is not simply a replacement for traditional national governments.
Its roles are limited to:
- final guarantee of world common rules
- preservation of civilization infrastructure
- response to disasters and planetary-scale risks
It does not control values or thought.
Authority is distributed functionally, with multiple audits and independent bodies checking operations.
It is designed so that a dictatorship by a single entity cannot take hold.
Q. Who makes the final decisions on important judgments?
A.
AI and specialists present the material for decision-making, the World Stability Organization organizes the options, and representative systems and democratic processes including majority voting make decisions.
Unanimity is not required.
This is the current concept, and we believe it should be refined through ongoing discussion.
Q. Are the rights of minorities protected?
A.
Minority opinions are not always adopted.
However, expressing opinions and existence itself is not excluded.
Minority opinions are not discarded, but are separated from decisions and remain recorded.
Q. Won’t the World Stability Organization become corrupt?
A.
We do not assume perfect absence of corruption.
However, authority is finely distributed, so corruption remains local and short-term, and can be corrected.
Q. What happens to those who continue to oppose the system and do not comply?
A.
Holding an opposing opinion itself is not an issue.
However, if one does not participate in the system, social support is not provided.
This is not punishment, but a design to link participation in the system with support.
Q. Is migration forced? Isn’t that a violation of human rights?
A.
Migration under this concept is not decided abruptly or arbitrarily.
- predetermined cycles
- clear rules
- system design including exceptions
are used.
Choosing not to participate in migration is not itself denied.
However, in that case, social welfare services such as housing, food, clothing, medical care, education, and living support will not be provided.
This is not a punishment, but a design to link participation in the system with social support.
In modern societies, many systems such as taxation, social insurance, and compulsory education are based on “participation,” and this concept merely makes that relationship more clearly structured.
In addition, in the following cases, exceptional permanent settlement is recognized:
- severe physical disability making migration extremely difficult
- situations requiring continuous high-level medical care in the same region
- other circumstances where migration is judged to be difficult
Q. Will family members or romantic partners be separated?
A.
Migration can be chosen at the level of family or quasi-family units.
Romantic partners are considered quasi-family if their relationship is registered.
This design minimizes severance of human relationships.
Q. Won’t human relationships and connections become thin?
A.
Traditional human relationships, that is:
- same land
- same community
- same faces
indeed will no longer be formed.
However, under this concept, human relationships do not “disappear,” but are considered to “change form.”
- connections with family or quasi-family are respected
- temporary, purpose-driven, and fluid connections become central
- relationships are based on activities, not belonging
This means a shift from “fixed communities” to “more flexible and fluid human connections.”
Q. Can one live without participating in the migration system?
A.
Yes. Individuals are provided opportunities to work and earn points.
However, to prevent formation of anti-social organizations, fixed group formation and command structures are not permitted.
Work is performed by individuals in short-term, transparent formats.
Q. Won’t freedom be greatly restricted?
A.
This concept reexamines not “a society that maximizes freedom,” but “a society in which freedom is less likely to translate into disadvantage or violence toward others.”
A society in which people can freely fix residence and place of employment may appear free, but it is also a structure in which war, discrimination, crime, and inequality can easily become fixed.
The Borderless Earth concept chooses to adjust some freedoms for society as a whole to reduce such structural problems.
This is not a denial of freedom, but a design to prevent freedom from becoming destructive.
Q. Won’t communication monitoring and goods management lead to thought control?
A.
Monitoring and management under this concept are not for controlling thought, speech, or values.
The purpose is limited to:
- detection of organized crime
- early identification of criminal plans
- prevention of structured violence and exploitation
Communication monitoring is conducted within the minimum necessary range, under clear rules and conditions, and with mechanisms to prevent arbitrary operation.
Thought and speech are not subjects of monitoring.
In modern society, surveillance such as security cameras, financial transaction monitoring, and legal disclosure of communication history already exist.
This concept does not expand them, but clarifies purpose and scope.
Q. Isn’t the idea that companies disappear unrealistic? What about work?
A.
This concept does not negate “working” such as production, research, and services.
It negates “structures based on lifelong affiliation with a specific company” and organizational forms with fixed ownership and employment.
In a society premised on migration, the model of working for a specific company for a lifetime does not exist.
Therefore, companies are redefined as project-based organizations that do not have specific owners, are shared by society, emerge as needed, and dissolve once their role is complete.
Work itself does not disappear, and AI and algorithms fairly assign work based on:
- personal wishes
- past experience
- social necessity
This is not cessation of economic activity, but redesign of economic structure.
Q. Where does the funding for infrastructure such as basic income come from?
A.
During the transition period, it is assumed military expenditures and other resources that become unnecessary in existing nations will be reallocated.
However, in the final form of this concept, traditional “funding sources” are not assumed.
Because this is a structure that directly provides essential survival infrastructure without relying on nations, taxes, or currency.
Constraints are not funding sources, but actual production capacity, manpower, and technological levels.
Q. Who manages production quantity and production?
A.
Production management is undertaken by a management officer commissioned by the World Stability Organization.
This role is similar to a “CEO” in modern terms, but the organization has no ownership rights.
Management officers serve fixed terms and are subject to rotation, bearing both authority and responsibility.
Q. What happens if production becomes insufficient?
A.
Production shortages are anticipated.
In case of shortage:
- minimum survival standards are temporarily adjusted
- workforce allocation is reexamined
- priority is given to introduction of technology and automation
- population allocation is reviewed
These structural adjustments are made.
Q. What happens if the population increases too much?
A.
Population increase is judged based on physical and environmental constraints, not funding sources.
If sustainability is exceeded, institutional adjustments such as support for childbirth and regulation of population growth pace are made.
This is not exclusion, but a design to protect survival conditions for the next generation.
Q. Isn’t birth restriction a violation of human rights?
A.
This concept does not deny the value of childbirth.
What is denied is a social structure that assumes unlimited population increase.
The focus is on what scale society can support, not who gives birth.
Q. If survival is guaranteed by infrastructure, won’t nobody work?
A.
This concept does not envision “a society where no one works,” but “a society where people do not have to work in order to live.”
Survival infrastructure such as housing, food, clothing, medical care, and education is guaranteed at a minimum level for participants, but entertainment and higher-level lifestyle choices are not guaranteed.
To gain more options and enjoyment, participation in social roles and projects is required to earn points.
In other words, “living is guaranteed, but survival alone does not make one prosperous.”
Work is positioned not as an obligation but as a choice to engage with society.
Q. What happens to the difference between people who make efforts and those who do not?
A.
Differences will not disappear.
However, their nature changes.
Under this concept, differences do not relate to survival or dignity, but to range of choices and experiences.
Points earned through effort and involvement lead to:
- highly preferred lifestyles
- unique experiences
- greater freedom of choice
Meanwhile, people who do not strive will not be threatened in survival nor excluded from society.
This is not a society where one must work to live, but one where “the more you engage, the broader your life becomes.”
Q. Who does the unpopular but necessary jobs?
A.
Necessary but unpopular jobs are rewarded with more points.
This ensures social need is fairly evaluated.
If there are still insufficient workers, rotation and automation are prioritized.
Q. If money is abolished, won’t the economy collapse?
A.
This concept adopts a points system instead of currency.
Points are primarily:
- compensation for labor and social participation
- limited by expiration
- not able to be accumulated without limit
This means if points are not used quickly, they disappear.
This design makes economic activity more active than now and makes it difficult for wealth gaps to become fixed.
Q. Is it okay to issue points infinitely?
A.
Points can theoretically be issued infinitely, but they cannot be used without limit.
Points are not value itself, but a ledger tool to adjust production and distribution.
Use limits, expiration, and purpose restrictions prevent inflation and fixed wealth accumulation structurally.
Q. Can fraud and crime really be eliminated?
A.
This concept does not suppress crime through morality or harsh penalties.
However, because currency does not exist:
- stealing money
- hiding money
- hoarding money
cannot occur under the system.
Moreover, with the design of the points system:
- transaction holds
- verification
- invalidation when fraud is detected
are possible, making crime a structure with no practical incentive.
Q. What happens if an independent town or economic zone is created outside the system?
A.
The formation of small communities itself is not denied.
However, it is expected that many people will choose to remain within the system because:
- survival foundations are more stable
- social infrastructure such as education and medical care is rich
- future prospects are clearer
As a result, structural difficulties arise in population growth, economic leap, armament, and influence expansion, preventing accumulation of power that could overturn the system.
Q. Why can we say that many people will remain within the system?
A.
People remain not because of coercion, but because the system provides:
- stable survival foundations
- robust social infrastructure
- predictable future prospects
This is an attraction based on rationality rather than force.
Q. Isn’t this concept unrealistic?
A.
Concepts such as nations, borders, and currency did not universally exist forever.
They are social systems that humanity has chosen in specific eras and situations.
The Borderless Earth concept does not start by discussing those systems as given, but asks whether war, discrimination, and crime can become structurally less likely by redesigning them.
Of course, this concept is not a plan that can be realized immediately.
Its realization will require long time and difficult processes such as global consensus and adjustments with existing systems and vested interests.
This is not a short-term implementation plan, but a design proposal to organize and present civilization choices from a long-term perspective.
Q. Is this concept “the correct answer for humanity’s future”?
A.
No. The Borderless Earth concept is not the only correct answer.
We also consider this concept incomplete and subject to improvement and updates.
However, rather than concluding that:
- war and discrimination are unavoidable
- they are inevitable due to human nature
we want to offer the option that “there is room to reconsider from structural perspectives.”
Q. What must humanity change to adapt to this society?
A.
For this concept to succeed, not only the system but humanity’s value system must be restructured.
In particular, the following assumptions will be questioned:
- “Permanent settlement is natural”
- “Security comes from belonging to the same group”
- Measuring prosperity by ownership and accumulation
- Believing human relationships should be fixed
The Borderless Earth concept is not a society that discards human relationships.
Rather, it asks:
- Can people connect without relying on fixation?
- Can people support one another?
as a question of “the next phase of humanity.”
Q. What happens if this concept fails?
A.
This concept does not assume it will never fail.
National reestablishment is not physically impossible, and records of currency values are preserved, so it is not designed to be irreversible.
For example:
- chronic production shortages
- uncontrollable population growth or decline
- significant loss of trust in the World Stability Organization
- increase in violence outside the system
- failure to reflect proposed corrections within the system
are predefined withdrawal criteria.
If the society is judged to be not functioning, structural revisions or reduction, and ultimately dismantling are possible.
The system does not become an end in itself that continues to bind humanity.
Q. To all media personnel
A.
This concept does not advocate specific ideologies or values, but is one design proposal that organizes conditions in which problems such as war, discrimination, and crime are less likely to arise.
When covering this concept, evaluation and positions should be free regardless of approval or disapproval.
Both positive views and strict criticism are sincerely received.
However, such judgments should be made based on both the advantages and disadvantages presented.
Materials for judgment will continue to be updated and publicly released as discussions progress and examinations deepen.
We at World Surprise Video share this concept to explore possibilities for a world without war and discrimination, referencing all opinions and debates we receive.
▶︎ Borderless Earth Concept Background